Has it therefore been the policy of the Board to judge all actions as not being "injurious or detrimental to the Society," and therefore not to overrule those actions, if they fall short of "extreme malfeasance or complete inability to do the job"?
The problem is that those two standards aren't related. I will address this in a separate post.
no subject
Has it therefore been the policy of the Board to judge all actions as not being "injurious or detrimental to the Society," and therefore not to overrule those actions, if they fall short of "extreme malfeasance or complete inability to do the job"?
The problem is that those two standards aren't related. I will address this in a separate post.