Holy mackerel!
Jan. 26th, 2009 11:15 pmRichard and I just spent almost $400 on a grocery shopping trip. No, we weren't shopping at Kowalski's; it was Cub. And we weren't buying party munchies or gourmet food, although we did buy some things I wouldn't buy if I were on a strict budget (things like meat and fresh fruit and a little jar of roasted peppers, nothing really crazy). When did food get so expensive?
Maybe I'll go back to The Hunger Site and click on it a few more times. (Thanks to
pegkerr for pointing me there with her Project Decrease Worldsuck entry for today).
Maybe I'll go back to The Hunger Site and click on it a few more times. (Thanks to
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:07 am (UTC)"(things like meat and fresh fruit and a little jar of roasted peppers, nothing really crazy)"
You'd think that kind of money would have funded lobster for the whole family, an indulgent visit to the Lund's or Byerly's cheese counters, and then some, wouldn't you? At least, I would.
Good luck!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:33 am (UTC)Target has some good food prices.
There are at least two sf stories in which someone uses a time machine for grocery shopping.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 02:22 pm (UTC)Eight times that kinda scares me. How many person-meals is that? I'm sure you're cooking more than we are. Are you regularly feeding three people? And I'm getting lunch at work (quite good cafeteria at just-over fast-food prices).
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 08:16 pm (UTC)Oh, gosh, no idea. This was one of those Restocking the Shelves shopping trips. We hadn't done a major shopping run for a couple of weeks, and were out of practically all fresh food, and low on the kinds of things that hide on pantry shelves and in freezers. We don't actually spend $380/week for 3 people on a regular basis.
But I'm pretty sure this is the most I've ever personally spent on a single grocery shopping trip; I'm just astounded that it is POSSIBLE. Richard and Thorin do most of the grocery shopping these days, which is, I suppose, why I'm surprised. I often do smaller shopping runs to Kowalski's, and I just kinda thought that K's was a much more expensive place than Cub. No, it's not that much more. Food has just gotten more expensive.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 08:27 pm (UTC)Honestly, we probably bought enough food on this shopping run to subsist on for a month or two (if we didn't care about having fresh food): lots of canned goods and frozens, 8 boxes of cereal (it was on sale), extra bread to put in the freezer, that kind of thing. We've also gotten into the habit of buying quite a bit of fresh produce (which can be pricey in Minnesota in the winter), Greek yogurt instead of the cheap kind, and other indulgences. We certainly could spend less if money were tight. On the other hand, we could easily spend a lot more.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 09:06 pm (UTC)Fresh produce is pricy everywhere, I think - but at least you can get it in the winter. I think we're both old enough to remember when that wasn't the case.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 08:41 pm (UTC)I haven't been to Cub on Nicollet fora long time, but was there this week. They've really spiffed the place up. I was also very very impressed with the huge selection of dried beans and peas. That sort of good cheap food is not stocked at Lund's and Kowalski's. They have a few beans, but they are packaged for yuppies, and so are more expensive without adding value.
K.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 10:02 pm (UTC)