After a night in the emergency room that resulted in nothing more concrete than a 10:50am appointment with an opthamologist....
My eye is okay. It was something called "separation of the vitreous humour," which is not in itself harmful but does occasionally result in a detached retina or other side effects. (
carbonel, was that what happened to you?) Apparently, this "separation of vitreous humor" happens to pretty much everybody. The vitreous humor changes consistency and gradually shrinks with age, and somewhere between the ages of 40 and 60 it shrinks enough to pull loose from the retina at the back of the eye. This is normal and doesn't change your eyesight. But it's sort of like a suction cup letting go, and tugs on the retina enough to cause "flashers" and often some residual floaters. You would think from the description that this would be a gradual process, but it commonly happens suddenly like it did with me. And once the process is complete it shouldn't happen again, at least for that eye.
Fortunately in my case it all went smoothly. My eye is pretty much back to normal now except for some cloudy floaters that ophalmologist says will probably disappear gradually. While relieved to find that I am not going to be faced with the choice of eye surgery or losing the sight in one eye, I am wondering why I hadn't been told about this phenomenon earlier. I've been wearing glasses since I was 9 years old, which means I have been visiting optometrists and opthalmologists on a regular basis for 50 years. Wouldn't you think that somewhere along the line (maybe about the time I got bifocals?) one of these optical professionals might have mentioned this set of weird symptoms that was almost certain to happen to me and provide some guidelines on how to tell the difference between the harmless flashers of an uneventful vitreous separation and the serious situation of a detached retina?
Not only has that never happened, I had a hard time pulling that information out of Dr. Kalina. Since I may be going through this again with the left eye, this would be good to know. It boils down to this - if you have a sudden onset of flashers but no loss of vision in the eye, make an appointment with an opthalmologist ASAP to have the eye dilated and examined for retinal damage. However, it is not an emergency unless there is loss of vision - typically loss of peripheral vision, missing spots in the visual field or a dark curtain moving in from the side (or occasionally down from the top).
Here's a Good article about this topic. Do not be alarmed by the appearance of the word "catastrophic." They appear to be using this word in a technical sense to mean "suddenly."
My eye is okay. It was something called "separation of the vitreous humour," which is not in itself harmful but does occasionally result in a detached retina or other side effects. (
Fortunately in my case it all went smoothly. My eye is pretty much back to normal now except for some cloudy floaters that ophalmologist says will probably disappear gradually. While relieved to find that I am not going to be faced with the choice of eye surgery or losing the sight in one eye, I am wondering why I hadn't been told about this phenomenon earlier. I've been wearing glasses since I was 9 years old, which means I have been visiting optometrists and opthalmologists on a regular basis for 50 years. Wouldn't you think that somewhere along the line (maybe about the time I got bifocals?) one of these optical professionals might have mentioned this set of weird symptoms that was almost certain to happen to me and provide some guidelines on how to tell the difference between the harmless flashers of an uneventful vitreous separation and the serious situation of a detached retina?
Not only has that never happened, I had a hard time pulling that information out of Dr. Kalina. Since I may be going through this again with the left eye, this would be good to know. It boils down to this - if you have a sudden onset of flashers but no loss of vision in the eye, make an appointment with an opthalmologist ASAP to have the eye dilated and examined for retinal damage. However, it is not an emergency unless there is loss of vision - typically loss of peripheral vision, missing spots in the visual field or a dark curtain moving in from the side (or occasionally down from the top).
Here's a Good article about this topic. Do not be alarmed by the appearance of the word "catastrophic." They appear to be using this word in a technical sense to mean "suddenly."
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 10:08 pm (UTC)It's not altogether different from the experience I had discovering that I have a completely harmless heart condition -- premature ventricular contractions. The symptoms are very alarming: irregular heartbeat and a pulsing sensation in my chest. But all it is is the ventricle contracting a bit early. It's still empty, so it feels like a missed beat. But the mechanics of it make it impossible for two beats to be missed in a row, 'cause it's certainly full on the second try. The treatment is more or less "don't drink so much coffee".
Only by going to the ER over it did I learn (a) from the doctors that it's very common and not dangerous (b) from my parents that my father has the same thing.
PVCs
Date: 2009-07-28 10:27 pm (UTC)I'm still puzzling over the question of whether that rather expensive procedure is an example of the "unnecessary tests" that everybody wants to cut out to lower health care costs. It seemed perfectly reasonable to request the test since I am middle-aged, obese and have a family history of heart disease. But ultimately, it turned out to be one of those "problems" that was created out of whole cloth simply by monitoring too many things. If I hadn't been diligently working out on exercise equipment with a heart-rate monitor (which I was doing for my health, of course) I would never have thought there was a problem in the first place.
Re: PVCs
Date: 2009-07-29 12:42 am (UTC)Now, to be fair, some of those blood draws were in response to a high hematocrit on the first several, which really is a totally separate issue. But that also turned out to be nothing, or more precisely, mild dehydration due to always drawing my blood right after I biked in to get my blood drawn.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 10:08 pm (UTC)I too have heard people talk about detached retinas before, but never this. I wonder if it often happens while people are sleeping so they miss all of the excitement and just wake up with more floaters than they used to have.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 10:14 pm (UTC)humor... this isn't funny
Date: 2009-07-28 10:16 pm (UTC)As it happened, I got back to Saigon, went to the French Vietnamese Hospital, got an immediate appointment, was seen early, had all the usual Western eye exams from an English-speaking, French-trained opthamologist and was charged $40. So, pretty lucky. Plus, I had B., who is excellent in these kinds of crises.
K.
Re: humor... this isn't funny
Date: 2009-07-28 10:32 pm (UTC)Now I'm even MORE annoyed at the strange lack of information about this phenomenon.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 10:37 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, I seem to have sustained permanent damage to my vision as a result (20/50 with correction instead of the previous 20/20), but at least it probably won't get any worse. The retinologist seems happy, anyway.
I'm glad your condition resolved on its own -- apparently that's the more common outcome.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 05:59 am (UTC)Glad you're okay.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-30 01:01 am (UTC)My particular eye doctor told me that even absent the loss of vision, it's just as well to be seen so they can determine that the vitreous detached cleanly.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-30 08:23 pm (UTC)Gosh, you'd think I'd remember that. This is the kind of medical geekery that usually sticks in my head. Oh well, now we've both done our part to educate the masses. What can you do.
"My particular eye doctor told me that even absent the loss of vision, it's just as well to be seen so they can determine that the vitreous detached cleanly."
Yes, that is pretty much what my guy said as well.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-31 01:37 am (UTC)I didn't even wonder why I hadn't heard about it if it's so common, but it's a good question.
P.