In an excess of enthusiasm at my DFL precinct caucus this year, I volunteered to be a candidate to the City Convention. The main thing that happens there this year is endorsing candidates for School Board. Anybody have anything to say about any of the candidates (including incumbents)?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:09 pm (UTC)These days, it's ALWAYS worth knowing if a school board candidate believes in creationism, even *privately.* Even if they're "open minded" enough to allow evolution to be taught, they're willing to make allowances for non-science to be in the science classroom.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:17 pm (UTC)On the other hand, if I were going to ask all the candidates one question I would be more interested in knowing how they plan to meet the needs of gifted (or even average) students while at the same time focusing most of their resources on at-risk students (as required by NCLB). There's no easy answer to that one, but in my mind it's the biggest challenge they will have to deal with.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:54 pm (UTC)NCLB is part of the move to make teaching a laborer job, with a defined curriculum that applies to every student, rather than a creative job where individual students' needs are met based on knowledge of the individual.
The right answer to that one then is "Find out from teachers how they want to address the immediate problem in their classroom, and work to repeal or limit the involvement of NCLB."
no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:13 pm (UTC)Second the worry about any whiff of creationism -- since it's often so carefully buried. In fact any overt mention of religion puts me off. Either it's not relevant to schooling, in which case why mention it; or if they think it IS relevant to schooling, then I oppose them.