Angioplasty won't do it this time
Jun. 21st, 2011 06:57 pmBack in 1995 Richard had several months of increasing abdominal and chest discomfort, culminating in an angioplasty. There were a few complications (the procedure was new at the time) but eventually he ended up with one stented artery and another one (the right aortal branch) that had been "ballooned" but was still just slightly constricted. Recently he's been having the same kind of abdominal and chest discomfort, and figured it was time for another angioplasty. He went in to Methodist Hospital on Monday for the angiogram, hoping to come home with the problem fixed. No such luck. Remember that right aortal artery that was never quite right? Now it's pretty much worn out - too many partial blockages to fix with balloons and stents. And a couple of the other arteries aren't looking too great either. It's too much to fix with an angioplasy, so he's going to need a heart bypass.
Now comes the tricky part. His condition is serious enough that the cardiologist wanted it done "sooner rather than later" but not serious enough to schedule an emergency bypass. The soonest they could get him in is June 29. This is inconvenient on so many levels that we asked if it would be safe to wait a few more weeks and do the thing in the last half of July. The answer to that question is a little hazy. We're seeing the cardiac surgeon on Thursday to come to a decision (we hope). In the meantime, Richard is taking some medication that is supposed to dilate the blood vessels enough to reduce or eliminate the angina (similarly reducing the chance of a heart attack). If the medication does its job it should be safe to wait a few more weeks. It's essentially the equivalent of rolling back the clock by months or years to a point when the arteries weren't quite so narrowed. However, if it doesn't have the desired effect we'll probably have to go with the first available date. I hope to know more soon.
Now comes the tricky part. His condition is serious enough that the cardiologist wanted it done "sooner rather than later" but not serious enough to schedule an emergency bypass. The soonest they could get him in is June 29. This is inconvenient on so many levels that we asked if it would be safe to wait a few more weeks and do the thing in the last half of July. The answer to that question is a little hazy. We're seeing the cardiac surgeon on Thursday to come to a decision (we hope). In the meantime, Richard is taking some medication that is supposed to dilate the blood vessels enough to reduce or eliminate the angina (similarly reducing the chance of a heart attack). If the medication does its job it should be safe to wait a few more weeks. It's essentially the equivalent of rolling back the clock by months or years to a point when the arteries weren't quite so narrowed. However, if it doesn't have the desired effect we'll probably have to go with the first available date. I hope to know more soon.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 10:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 12:54 am (UTC)do you need anything?
Date: 2011-06-22 01:18 am (UTC)K.
Re: do you need anything?
Date: 2011-06-22 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 01:23 am (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 03:42 am (UTC)Dislike!
Date: 2011-06-22 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 09:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-22 02:38 pm (UTC)