Heat index - threat or menace?
Jul. 20th, 2011 11:59 amWe all know that it is miserably hot and humid; do we really need a made up number to tell us exactly how miserable we are? Well, maybe we do, because if we didn't have weather drama why would anybody even watch network TV anymore?
But I have yet to see a coherent explanation of what "feels like 117" actually means. Does 97 degrees at 80% humidity "feel like" 117 with zero humidity? Or like 117 with some kind of average humidity? Or like 117 in one of those states where they keep saying "But it's okay because it's a dry heat?" Because I'm not sure that even in the desert there is such a thing as zero humidity.
Personally, I think they just made up a random formula because Big Weather was whining about not having a number as dramatic as the Wind Chill Index that they could throw around in the summer to alarm people.
But I have yet to see a coherent explanation of what "feels like 117" actually means. Does 97 degrees at 80% humidity "feel like" 117 with zero humidity? Or like 117 with some kind of average humidity? Or like 117 in one of those states where they keep saying "But it's okay because it's a dry heat?" Because I'm not sure that even in the desert there is such a thing as zero humidity.
Personally, I think they just made up a random formula because Big Weather was whining about not having a number as dramatic as the Wind Chill Index that they could throw around in the summer to alarm people.
humidity
Date: 2011-07-20 05:12 pm (UTC)Re: humidity
Date: 2011-07-20 05:39 pm (UTC)The dew point is a perfectly good measurement with a clear scientific meaning. But if you have the dew point and the temperature, I think you've pretty much covered the bases.
Re: humidity
Date: 2011-07-20 06:07 pm (UTC)I didn't know that about the frozen flesh. I'd be curious how they figured that out, unless they happened to do it on poor souls who died out there. I'd also be curious how they came up with the heat index. How do they figure out just how hot it feels like it is out there?
no subject
Date: 2011-07-20 06:20 pm (UTC)B
no subject
Date: 2011-07-20 08:05 pm (UTC)Why pick that combination to norm against? Our heat index yesterday may "feel like" 117F somewhere, but it probably doesn't feel anything like 117F in places like Arizona, where real temperatures of 117 are not uncommon but the humidity is almost never as high as 50%.
Personally, I think the temperature the last few days feels like 145. So there.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-20 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-21 02:10 am (UTC)80F: 44%
85F: 45%
90F: 40%
95F: Below 40%, which the page says the formula is not valid for
100F: Same deal.
I am skeptical.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-21 02:22 am (UTC)at least broadly agrees with the Wikipedia formula.
Since 40% humidity is nearly the bottom of what we normally get in Minnesota in the summer, it hardly seems reasonable to set it as the reference. As you say, it just allows weather reporters to quote shockingly high heat indexes all the time, since the heat index is *always* higher than the temperature.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-20 06:59 pm (UTC)The basic idea -- that it's less comfortable at 94F/90% than at 94F/60%, for example -- I strongly agree with. I'm not sure which is more dangerous -- dehydration would be faster at lower humidity, wouldn't it? So we can race dehydration against actual heat stroke and see who "wins".
Remember, people, thirst is not a reliable guide to needing to take in more fluids in hot conditions!
no subject
Date: 2011-07-20 10:04 pm (UTC)