I have now read multiple reports of the Facebook experiment where Facebook "manipulated users' newsfeeds" to see how it affected their emotional state. I am mildly appalled but not even a tiny bit surprised. But I am having a hard time figuring out what they actually did. I gather that it was an unusually badly designed experiment based on counting words without regard to context, which means it proved exactly nothing. Kind of a bad ROI for riling up the membership. But what did they DO?
It is my understanding that the Facebook "News Feed" is actually where you read posts from your friends. So were they DELETING posts from friends that had the "wrong" emotional values for this particular subject? Were they moving the placement of the posts so they were less likely to be seen? Or were they actually editing the posts - removing keywords like "happy" and "sad?" Or maybe they were adding posts from fake users to change the emotional balance of the newsfeed?
Facebook users (you know who you are), do you know whether your posts were altered or deleted? Does it matter to you?
supergee, I borrowed your facebook tag format. I hope you don't mind. It cracks me up every time I see it.
It is my understanding that the Facebook "News Feed" is actually where you read posts from your friends. So were they DELETING posts from friends that had the "wrong" emotional values for this particular subject? Were they moving the placement of the posts so they were less likely to be seen? Or were they actually editing the posts - removing keywords like "happy" and "sad?" Or maybe they were adding posts from fake users to change the emotional balance of the newsfeed?
Facebook users (you know who you are), do you know whether your posts were altered or deleted? Does it matter to you?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)